Highways Agency contracts

Highways Agency inspections – Concerns about M40 and M25 contracts (2)

On December 10, 2012, in DBFO contracts, Highways Agency contracts, M25, M40, by PeterSilverman
0

Please refer to my previous post on this subject. I received a reply to my e-mail of 4th December from the Highways Agency and can add the following further observations. DBFO (AREA)30- M40 I had said “The quarterly audit reports you sent me each covered a specific area namely “Structures”, “Health and Safety” and “Quality Management”. Could [...]

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency inspections – Concerns about M40 and M25 contracts

On December 4, 2012, in Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, Highways Agency information requests, M25, M40, Uncategorized, by PeterSilverman
0

Following the receipt of infomation from the Highways Agency this post raises a number of concerns about the efficacy of their inspection processes

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency Asset Support Contracts – e-mail to Philip Rutman

On October 22, 2012, in Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

The key question “.. how the Agency will be able to monitor whether or not the service, in regard to the cleaning of non-paved areas, is being delivered to specification?” remains unanswered

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency contracts – Links

On June 7, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

Highways Agency contracts – Links

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency Asset Support Contract – response to Agency

On June 7, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

Thank you for your e-mail of 29th May which correctly pointed out a misquotation in my e-mail of 4th May to Mike Penning.

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency Asset Support Contract – reply from the Agency

On June 7, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

Thank you for your email of 4 May to Mike Penning about the Highways Agency’s Asset Support Contract.

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency Asset Support Contract – email to Mike Penning 4th May 2012

On May 5, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency contracts, Mike Penning, by PeterSilverman
0

The combination of a specification which is both inadequate and virtually impossible to monitor in my opinion means that the new contract is inconsistent with the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that the motorways in England are, so far as is practicable, kept clear of litter.

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency’s Asset Support Contract – critique of Highways Agency response to e-mail to Mike Penning

On May 2, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

The purpose of this post is to critique Freda Rashdi’s (FR’s) response to my e-mail to Mike Penning of 10th April in which I concluded that the new contract will put the Secretary of State for Transport, Justine Greening, in breach of her obligations under S 89 (1) of the Environmental Protection Act.

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency’s Asset Support Contract – response to email to Mike Penning

On May 2, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

Freda Rashdi head of the Highways Agency’s team responsible for specifying their cleaning requirements replies to my e-mail to Mike Penning of 10th April 2012

Continue reading >>

Highways Agency’s Asset Support Contract – Further thoughts

On April 13, 2012, in Asset Support Contracts, Highways Agency, Highways Agency contracts, by PeterSilverman
0

The Highways Agency seem to be caught up in a tangle web of confusing documentation and management speak

Continue reading >>